Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
JCI Insight ; 8(1)2023 01 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2194475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To minimize COVID-19 pandemic burden and spread, 3-dose vaccination campaigns commenced worldwide. Since patients who are pregnant are at increased risk for severe disease, they were recently included in that policy, despite the lack of available evidence regarding the impact of a third boosting dose during pregnancy, underscoring the urgent need for relevant data. We aimed to characterize the effect of the third boosting dose of mRNA Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine in pregnancy. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers (n = 213) upon delivery in maternal and cord blood of naive fully vaccinated parturients who received a third dose (n = 86) as compared with 2-dose recipients (n = 127). RESULTS: We found a robust surge in maternal and cord blood levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 titers at the time of delivery, when comparing pregnancies in which the mother received a third boosting dose with 2-dose recipients. The effect of the third boosting dose remained significant when controlling for the trimester of last exposure, suggesting additive immunity extends beyond that obtained after the second dose. Milder side effects were reported following the third dose, as compared with the second vaccine dose, among the fully vaccinated group. CONCLUSION: The third boosting dose of mRNA Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine augmented maternal and neonatal immunity with mild side effects. These data provide evidence to bolster clinical and public health guidance, reassure patients, and increase vaccine uptake among patients who are pregnant. FUNDING: Israel Science Foundation KillCorona grant 3777/19; Research grant from the "Ofek" Program of the Hadassah Medical Center.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Infant, Newborn , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , BNT162 Vaccine , Immunity, Humoral , Pandemics , Prospective Studies , Mothers , RNA, Messenger
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 227(3): 486.e1-486.e10, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1959260

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Post-COVID-19 vaccine boosting is a potent tool in the ongoing pandemic. Relevant data regarding this approach during pregnancy are lacking, which affects vaccination policy guidance, public acceptance, and vaccine uptake during pregnancy. We aimed to investigate the dynamics of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels following SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy and to characterize the effect of a single postinfection vaccine booster dose on the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in parturients in comparison with the levels in naïve vaccinated and convalescent, nonboosted parturients. STUDY DESIGN: Serum samples prospectively collected from parturients and umbilical cords at delivery at our university-affiliated urban medical center in Jerusalem, Israel, from May to October 2021, were selected and analyzed in a case-control manner. Study groups comprised the following participants: a consecutive sample of parturients with a polymerase chain reaction-confirmed history of COVID-19 during any stage of pregnancy; and comparison groups selected according to time of exposure comprising (1) convalescent, nonboosted parturients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19; (2) convalescent parturients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed COVID-19 who received a single booster dose of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine; and (3) infection-naïve, fully vaccinated parturients who received 2 doses of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine. Outcomes that were determined included maternal and umbilical cord blood anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels detected at delivery, the reported side effects, and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 228 parturients aged 18 to 45 years were included. Of those, samples from 64 were studied to characterize the titer dynamics following COVID-19 at all stages of pregnancy. The boosting effect was determined by comparing (1) convalescent (n=54), (2) boosted convalescent (n=60), and (3) naïve, fully vaccinated (n=114) parturients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels detected on delivery showed a gradual and significant decline over time from infection to delivery (r=0.4371; P=.0003). Of the gravidae infected during the first trimester, 34.6% (9/26) tested negative at delivery, compared with 9.1% (3/33) of those infected during the second trimester (P=.023). Significantly higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels were observed among boosted convalescent than among nonboosted convalescent (17.6-fold; P<.001) and naïve vaccinated parturients (3.2-fold; P<.001). Similar patterns were observed in umbilical cord blood. Side effects in convalescent gravidae resembled those in previous reports of mild symptoms following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Postinfection maternal humoral immunity wanes during pregnancy, leading to low or undetectable protective titers for a marked proportion of patients. A single boosting dose of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine induced a robust increase in protective titers for both the mother and newborn with moderate reported side effects.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Viral Vaccines , Antibodies, Viral , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Humans , Immunity, Humoral , Infant, Newborn , RNA, Messenger , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccines, Synthetic , Viral Vaccines/adverse effects , mRNA Vaccines
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 22(1): 166, 2022 Feb 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1714652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 during pregnancy is associated with adverse outcomes for mother and fetus. SARS-CoV-2 vaccination has significantly reduced the risk of symptomatic disease. Several small studies have reported the safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy, with no adverse effect on obstetric outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during pregnancy and maternal and neonatal outcomes in a large cohort study. Furthermore, to evaluate if timing of vaccination during pregnancy is related to adverse outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women who delivered between December 2020 and July 2021 at a large tertiary medical center. Excluded were women with multiple pregnancy, vaccination prior to pregnancy, COVID-19 infection during or before pregnancy, or unknown timing of vaccination. Primary outcomes were the incidence of preterm labor and of small for gestational age. Secondary outcomes were other maternal and neonatal complications. A secondary analysis investigating the association between time of vaccination and outcomes was also performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 5618 women who met the inclusion criteria: 2,305 (41%) women were vaccinated and 3,313 (59%) were unvaccinated. There were no differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients with respect to primary outcomes. The rate of preterm birth was 5.5% in the vaccinated group compared to 6.2% in the unvaccinated group (p = 0.31). Likewise, the rates of small for gestational age were comparable between the two groups (6.2% vs. 7.0% respectively, p = 0.2). In a secondary analysis focusing on time of vaccination and its relationship with outcomes, patients vaccinated in the second trimester (n = 964) and in the third trimester (n = 1329) were independently compared to their unvaccinated counterparts. Women who were vaccinated in the second trimester were more likely to have a preterm birth (8.1% vs. 6.2%, p < 0.001). This association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, 95%CI 1.11, 2.01). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 vaccine appears to be safe during pregnancy with no increase in incidence of preterm labor and small for gestational age compared to unvaccinated women. However, in women vaccinated during the second trimester there may be an increase in the rate of preterm birth.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Infant, Small for Gestational Age , Patient Safety , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Vaccination , Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Trimesters , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Time Factors
4.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 155(1): 95-100, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1251992

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patterns of pregnancy-related venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, mediated by population mobility restrictions during lockdown periods. METHODS: Pregnancy-related VTE hospitalizations were identified through a code-targeted search of the Hadassah Medical Center's computerized database. A manual analysis of relevant medical records was performed, and cases diagnosed throughout the year 2020 were compared to those diagnosed during 2019 and 2018. Statistical analyses studied obstetrical outcomes, as well as the extent and treatment of VTE events during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to those of preceding years, stratified by pre-, intra-, and post-lockdown periods. RESULTS: The incidence of pregnancy-related thromboembolic events during 2020 was 0.16% of all deliveries, significantly higher than in 2018 and 2019 (0.06% and 0.1%, respectively; P < 0.05). Higher rates of VTE events were found during post-lockdown periods in 2020, compared with corresponding time periods in 2019 and 2018. CONCLUSION: The present data suggest that lockdown periods impact pregnancy-related VTE hospitalizations, possibly as a result of restricted population mobility. Increased awareness of this undesirable outcome may aid health policymakers in the continuing struggle with epidemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Venous Thromboembolism , Venous Thrombosis , Communicable Disease Control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Venous Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL